The idea is kind of neat, but the only one of these that’s actually well executed would be the scene board things. Whatever you call them, the one at about 30 seconds in. And the pants at 1:45 look like they’re hideous even without the eyes.
Moral: Don’t put eyes on your pants. It’s just disturbing. Especially if they’re supposed to wink but are far too large to actually do so.
And if your going to do things like scene whatsits and ducks, it’s okay to go with only one, seriously.
oh, see, these are clearly not marketed to people like me. See, I’m on that new drug, noassatol, soooooo I couldn’t wear these even if they WERE cute. Kudos for the idea, beans for the finished product.
Well apparently you have to be fat to wear these. And what’s with the horrible camera work? Go to Wal-Mart and spend the 20 fucking dollars on a tripod. Not like this would actually help sell this clothing design abortion though.
August 21st, 2009 - 08:44
LOOK AT MAH ASS!
August 21st, 2009 - 08:58
To..ward off predators?
August 21st, 2009 - 10:06
They’re watching me.. always watching..
August 21st, 2009 - 10:32
Owl Balls!
August 21st, 2009 - 11:21
That is genius! I lost pretty early in though. I blame the music.
August 21st, 2009 - 11:47
fucking lol! music is pretty horrible.
August 21st, 2009 - 12:33
The idea is kind of neat, but the only one of these that’s actually well executed would be the scene board things. Whatever you call them, the one at about 30 seconds in. And the pants at 1:45 look like they’re hideous even without the eyes.
Moral: Don’t put eyes on your pants. It’s just disturbing. Especially if they’re supposed to wink but are far too large to actually do so.
And if your going to do things like scene whatsits and ducks, it’s okay to go with only one, seriously.
August 21st, 2009 - 13:02
this is the worst idea. ever.
August 21st, 2009 - 15:06
oh, see, these are clearly not marketed to people like me. See, I’m on that new drug, noassatol, soooooo I couldn’t wear these even if they WERE cute. Kudos for the idea, beans for the finished product.
August 21st, 2009 - 15:20
It looks less like winking and more like spastic seizure eye rolling.
Seriously, couldn’t you get a better ass model?
August 21st, 2009 - 16:22
Winkers. PUN PUN PUN
August 21st, 2009 - 17:24
The owl needs tits.
If they create a model with an owl with tits, I’ll eat chocolate until I can wear one.
August 21st, 2009 - 19:42
My eyes started burning at 3 minutes.
And i like how they think showing people walking Forever with Elevator Music is going to make people want them.
August 22nd, 2009 - 05:11
A part of me thought this was a brilliant idea.
Simultaneously, another part of me died.
August 22nd, 2009 - 19:44
What. Where are the Pacmans?
August 23rd, 2009 - 01:51
Well apparently you have to be fat to wear these. And what’s with the horrible camera work? Go to Wal-Mart and spend the 20 fucking dollars on a tripod. Not like this would actually help sell this clothing design abortion though.
August 23rd, 2009 - 21:43
For the love of all that is good, zoom out!
August 25th, 2009 - 16:40
I googled around, and these Winkers are really a bargain at “$149-569.”
September 12th, 2009 - 00:44
I don’t like that shit. Not at all.
November 19th, 2009 - 23:47
That’s the dumbest fucking thing I’ve ever seen.
January 7th, 2010 - 15:21
Those are creepy.