The Internet Is Terrible

27 Responses to “Fun for the whole family”

1. 1 Abo
   Jun 7th, 2008 at 10:31 am

   hahah WTF?

   thats some crazy shit!

2. 2 no
   Jun 7th, 2008 at 10:43 am

   thats sick

3. 3 SG
   Jun 7th, 2008 at 1:20 pm

   That doesn’t look fake at all.

4. 4 O_o
   Jun 7th, 2008 at 4:50 pm

   Photoshopped. You can tell, the reflections are all wrong.

5. 5 OpenOffice.org
   Jun 7th, 2008 at 7:48 pm

   O_o,

   Please help us slackers see the reflections that are incorrect.

   Thank you.

6. 6 Annoymous
   Jun 7th, 2008 at 10:14 pm

   O_o is right. This looks shopped. I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.

7. 7 Ok?
   Jun 8th, 2008 at 1:14 pm

   To poster #2

   Whats so sick about this? The title is just noting that the rest of the family is there. Mom or someone in the background and baby in the foreground. I saw nothing that said the naked girl was related to the guy. Shix…I wish stupid people would stop just assuming things.

8. 8 Mizz_Cloud
   Jun 8th, 2008 at 1:49 pm

   Man I didn’t even realize it at first either!
   I usually take notice to such things as well…

9. 9 ok sure buddy
   Jun 8th, 2008 at 4:27 pm

   Yea thats what they all say, I saw 1 million shopped photos so therfore Im the internet expert on the subject.

   Who cares if its fake or not. Its funny and thats what counts

10. 10 J
    Jun 8th, 2008 at 5:38 pm

    I got my friend a stripper for his 18th
    His whole family was there.

    She stripped him.

    And whipped him.

11. 11 Tsssk
    Jun 9th, 2008 at 3:45 pm

    I don’t see anything wrong, and i agree that it being funny is all that counts.
    But the fact is that it’s ’shopped. The whole group is looking in the wrong direction. On the first pic, even the “victim” is looking towards the left, not at the stripper at all. Who in their right mind would do that ?

12. 12 terry wagar
    Jun 9th, 2008 at 4:34 pm

    in portland oregon, year 2005, joan wagar and eric carlson decided to murder there spouse’s,
    joan poisoned her husband, who at the time was a plasma donor, which makes joan a serial killer.
    my name is terry wagar, Im backing up these charges with my life.

13. 13 Samm
    Jun 9th, 2008 at 8:22 pm

    Wtf?!
    Theres a baby
    >.<

    Thats so inapropriate

14. 14 Ginger Vitus
    Jun 11th, 2008 at 11:31 am

    Hey, “terry wagar” - YOU’RE BATSHIT.

15. 15 Uncle B
    Jun 16th, 2008 at 11:44 am

    When the oil’s all gone the party’s over America!

16. 16 Bulesman
    Jun 16th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    @ Samm

    I suppose breast feeding is in appropriate too?

    That child looks young enough to still be fed by breast, so maybe all the baby sees is “food on the hoof” ?

    You must come from a very “uptight” society to see your world in such a sad way

    Did your God make a mistake by putting breasts on women?

    Or by making your body a source of shame for you ?

    What a pity

17. 17 terry wagar
    Jun 16th, 2008 at 2:37 pm

    In portland oregon, Joan Wagar and Eric Carlson are in A Murder conspiracy together.
    And Clackamas Walmart are acttively helping them by hideing Eric’s employment there from me and my family.
    For over A year now Eric Carlson has been going by the name gashel, last name unknown by me, he dyed his hair black, and Walmart agreed to hide his Identity from my daughter, who also worked at that store.
    Joan and Eric have friends in Authority protecting Joan and Eric from prosecution.
    I have reported this repeatedly to the Authority’s and they are ignoring Joan and Eric’s CONSPIRACY.
    I would be more than happy to Testify to this but the Authority’s are covering this up so my testimony would simply dissapear.
    My name is Terry Wagar and Im backing up these charges.
    Nomatter how many people Joan and Eric poisoned the Authority’s here in portland Oregon refuse to arrest them.
    Im making these charges public because of the blatent coverup of these charges.

18. 18 Anonymous
    Jun 27th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    “Terry” - you are the fucking weirdest troll I’ve ever seen so points for that.

19. 19 Calamari
    Jun 28th, 2008 at 4:36 am

    I don’t get it…. What is shopped? Photoshop is one of my specialty’s and I don’t see anything. Its just a bachelor party. Thats like saying you eat out all the time so you are a master chef. It’s hard to have reflections when everything is hard wood. Sheesh, take an art class learn about light and shadow. Those funny pixels could just be a shitty camera. If it’s about the baby being there look at the family they are friggan rednecks!

20. 20 Food for Thought
    Jun 28th, 2008 at 5:37 am

    What exactly makes this sick, inapropriate an all that?

    If you think the baby gives a darn shit about breats that won’t give milk you better think again…and all the others in the room seem tough enough to bear the terrible, terrible sight of a partially naked beauty.

    Next time you take a walk with your kids and light a cigarrette, you might wanna let words like “inapropriate” or “sick” cross your mind
    again.

21. 21 just me
    Jun 29th, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    Boobs for a baby for breastfeeding, that’s fine….strippers and the such are INAPPROPRIATE for a baby.

    Either way, still hilarious.

22. 22 SSG B
    Jun 29th, 2008 at 11:54 pm

    Yeah, thats sooooo inappropriate for a baby! (sarcasm) cmon, I mean after all, it’s not like they never seen pussy or tits before! I am betting the kid is thinking, MMMMM, DINER TIME!

23. 23 Me
    Jul 2nd, 2008 at 11:26 pm

    YOU’RE Photoshopped!

24. 24 Looking at it from a different angle...
    Jul 3rd, 2008 at 2:27 am

    Perhaps the “stripper” is part of the family?

    Maybe, wife to be?
    Maybe, sister-in-law?
    Maybe, the baby’s mother?

    The two women in the picture (the older lady in the back & the “stripper”), could look like either…

    Anyhoo, I love how these comments section always turn out as off-track arguments between people who will most likely never see each other.

    Maybe instead of arguing who is the better photoshop expert or if it’s wrong to show a breast when not feeding to a baby is inappropriate, just have a laugh at the pic and send it to your friends. If you don’t like it or even angered you… just bring it up to the webmaster.

    Well I’m starting to contradict myself by contributing to the “comments argument wars”…

25. 25 Jay
    Jul 3rd, 2008 at 9:48 am

    O.K. - normally I don’t post on these things, but these people who always say “it’s photoshopped” drive me nuts.
    I work in advertising. I have been considered a photoshop expert for about 10 years - that’s a total of 20 years experience in Photoshop. Not playing around, but using it everyday for 20 years.
    I can do stuff that would make your head spin - and I can do stuff that you’d NEVER be able to tell was altered. That’s my job - to make it look real. THIS IMAGE IS NOT PHOTOSHOPPED YOU LITTLE TWITS!

26. 26 Jenna
    Jul 3rd, 2008 at 9:49 am

    First, it’s not photoshopped.

    Second, what is so damned evil about nudity that children have to be protected from nakedness at all costs? Or even sex for that matter? It’s a creative act as opposed to killing and war, which we have no qualms about exposing our kids to.

    Third, I thought it was inappropriate to have your MOM at a bachelor party way more than having an infant who can’t talk and won’t remember it all. Who has their mother at a bachelor party….or ANY woman other than waitresses and strippers?

    Fourth, if you are going to have a bachelor party, it behooves the best man to go out of pocket and either rent a suite or a party room in a bar. DO NOT have it in your mama’s dining room.

27. 27 Jay
    Jul 3rd, 2008 at 10:26 am

    BTW - any of you “Photoshop Experts” that want to challenge me, I will be glad to set up a Flickr Page with some images to see much you really know about spotting retouched images.

Leave a Reply