Fun for the whole family
Posted by Raisins | Filed under Picture
Tags: baby, idiot, sex, stripper
Hey, we make this stuff. Support the site and buy cool gifts or things you want DIRECTLY from me.
30 Responses to “Fun for the whole family”
-
Abo
hahah WTF?
thats some crazy shit!
posted on:June 7th, 2008 at 10:31 am -
no
thats sick
posted on:June 7th, 2008 at 10:43 am -
SG
That doesn’t look fake at all.
posted on:June 7th, 2008 at 1:20 pm -
O_o
Photoshopped. You can tell, the reflections are all wrong.
posted on:June 7th, 2008 at 4:50 pm -
OpenOffice.org
O_o,
Please help us slackers see the reflections that are incorrect.
Thank you.
posted on:June 7th, 2008 at 7:48 pm -
Annoymous
O_o is right. This looks shopped. I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.
posted on:June 7th, 2008 at 10:14 pm -
Ok?
To poster #2
Whats so sick about this? The title is just noting that the rest of the family is there. Mom or someone in the background and baby in the foreground. I saw nothing that said the naked girl was related to the guy. Shix…I wish stupid people would stop just assuming things.
posted on:June 8th, 2008 at 1:14 pm -
Mizz_Cloud
Man I didn’t even realize it at first either!
I usually take notice to such things as well…
posted on:June 8th, 2008 at 1:49 pm -
ok sure buddy
Yea thats what they all say, I saw 1 million shopped photos so therfore Im the internet expert on the subject.
Who cares if its fake or not. Its funny and thats what counts
posted on:June 8th, 2008 at 4:27 pm -
J
I got my friend a stripper for his 18th
His whole family was there.She stripped him.
And whipped him.
posted on:June 8th, 2008 at 5:38 pm -
Tsssk
I don’t see anything wrong, and i agree that it being funny is all that counts.
But the fact is that it’s ’shopped. The whole group is looking in the wrong direction. On the first pic, even the “victim” is looking towards the left, not at the stripper at all. Who in their right mind would do that ?
posted on:June 9th, 2008 at 3:45 pm -
terry wagar
in portland oregon, year 2005, joan wagar and eric carlson decided to murder there spouse’s,
joan poisoned her husband, who at the time was a plasma donor, which makes joan a serial killer.
my name is terry wagar, Im backing up these charges with my life.
posted on:June 9th, 2008 at 4:34 pm -
Samm
Wtf?!
Theres a baby
>.<Thats so inapropriate
posted on:June 9th, 2008 at 8:22 pm -
Ginger Vitus
Hey, “terry wagar” - YOU’RE BATSHIT.
posted on:June 11th, 2008 at 11:31 am -
Uncle B
When the oil’s all gone the party’s over America!
posted on:June 16th, 2008 at 11:44 am -
Bulesman
@ Samm
I suppose breast feeding is in appropriate too?
That child looks young enough to still be fed by breast, so maybe all the baby sees is “food on the hoof” ?
You must come from a very “uptight” society to see your world in such a sad way
Did your God make a mistake by putting breasts on women?
Or by making your body a source of shame for you ?
What a pity
posted on:June 16th, 2008 at 1:36 pm -
terry wagar
In portland oregon, Joan Wagar and Eric Carlson are in A Murder conspiracy together.
And Clackamas Walmart are acttively helping them by hideing Eric’s employment there from me and my family.
For over A year now Eric Carlson has been going by the name gashel, last name unknown by me, he dyed his hair black, and Walmart agreed to hide his Identity from my daughter, who also worked at that store.
Joan and Eric have friends in Authority protecting Joan and Eric from prosecution.
I have reported this repeatedly to the Authority’s and they are ignoring Joan and Eric’s CONSPIRACY.
I would be more than happy to Testify to this but the Authority’s are covering this up so my testimony would simply dissapear.
My name is Terry Wagar and Im backing up these charges.
Nomatter how many people Joan and Eric poisoned the Authority’s here in portland Oregon refuse to arrest them.
Im making these charges public because of the blatent coverup of these charges.
posted on:June 16th, 2008 at 2:37 pm -
Anonymous
“Terry” - you are the fucking weirdest troll I’ve ever seen so points for that.
posted on:June 27th, 2008 at 3:03 pm -
Calamari
I don’t get it…. What is shopped? Photoshop is one of my specialty’s and I don’t see anything. Its just a bachelor party. Thats like saying you eat out all the time so you are a master chef. It’s hard to have reflections when everything is hard wood. Sheesh, take an art class learn about light and shadow. Those funny pixels could just be a shitty camera. If it’s about the baby being there look at the family they are friggan rednecks!
posted on:June 28th, 2008 at 4:36 am -
Food for Thought
What exactly makes this sick, inapropriate an all that?
If you think the baby gives a darn shit about breats that won’t give milk you better think again…and all the others in the room seem tough enough to bear the terrible, terrible sight of a partially naked beauty.
Next time you take a walk with your kids and light a cigarrette, you might wanna let words like “inapropriate” or “sick” cross your mind
again.
posted on:June 28th, 2008 at 5:37 am -
just me
Boobs for a baby for breastfeeding, that’s fine….strippers and the such are INAPPROPRIATE for a baby.
Either way, still hilarious.
posted on:June 29th, 2008 at 5:16 pm -
SSG B
Yeah, thats sooooo inappropriate for a baby! (sarcasm) cmon, I mean after all, it’s not like they never seen pussy or tits before! I am betting the kid is thinking, MMMMM, DINER TIME!
posted on:June 29th, 2008 at 11:54 pm -
Me
YOU’RE Photoshopped!
posted on:July 2nd, 2008 at 11:26 pm -
Looking at it from a different angle...
Perhaps the “stripper” is part of the family?
Maybe, wife to be?
Maybe, sister-in-law?
Maybe, the baby’s mother?The two women in the picture (the older lady in the back & the “stripper”), could look like either…
Anyhoo, I love how these comments section always turn out as off-track arguments between people who will most likely never see each other.
Maybe instead of arguing who is the better photoshop expert or if it’s wrong to show a breast when not feeding to a baby is inappropriate, just have a laugh at the pic and send it to your friends. If you don’t like it or even angered you… just bring it up to the webmaster.
Well I’m starting to contradict myself by contributing to the “comments argument wars”…
posted on:July 3rd, 2008 at 2:27 am -
Jay
O.K. - normally I don’t post on these things, but these people who always say “it’s photoshopped” drive me nuts.
I work in advertising. I have been considered a photoshop expert for about 10 years - that’s a total of 20 years experience in Photoshop. Not playing around, but using it everyday for 20 years.
I can do stuff that would make your head spin - and I can do stuff that you’d NEVER be able to tell was altered. That’s my job - to make it look real. THIS IMAGE IS NOT PHOTOSHOPPED YOU LITTLE TWITS!
posted on:July 3rd, 2008 at 9:48 am -
Jenna
First, it’s not photoshopped.
Second, what is so damned evil about nudity that children have to be protected from nakedness at all costs? Or even sex for that matter? It’s a creative act as opposed to killing and war, which we have no qualms about exposing our kids to.
Third, I thought it was inappropriate to have your MOM at a bachelor party way more than having an infant who can’t talk and won’t remember it all. Who has their mother at a bachelor party….or ANY woman other than waitresses and strippers?
Fourth, if you are going to have a bachelor party, it behooves the best man to go out of pocket and either rent a suite or a party room in a bar. DO NOT have it in your mama’s dining room.
posted on:July 3rd, 2008 at 9:49 am -
Jay
BTW - any of you “Photoshop Experts” that want to challenge me, I will be glad to set up a Flickr Page with some images to see much you really know about spotting retouched images.
posted on:July 3rd, 2008 at 10:26 am -
umit
what a suck thing.around family and baby ..sick people
posted on:November 28th, 2008 at 9:14 am -
lolinthea23
nice ass on her, though. that’s all i cared about.
posted on:December 10th, 2008 at 9:33 pm -
Tchotch
I looked at these pictures for two hours and there are no discrepancies that I can find.
Incidently, I’m out of Kleenex.
posted on:January 3rd, 2009 at 3:57 pm
![[Digg]](http://theinternetisterrible.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://theinternetisterrible.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[MySpace]](http://theinternetisterrible.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Reddit]](http://theinternetisterrible.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://theinternetisterrible.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Technorati]](http://theinternetisterrible.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)